The Dalai clique has been playing "word games" the master, they dished out the various concepts are indeed people, "dazzling."
"Human rights questions", "religious freedom" and "ethnic conflict" and "cultural genocide"…… look terrific to Hongtuo the so-called "Tibet issue." And the "Tibet issue" to the solution, they also opened a variety of "prescriptions", a "five-point plan", "new seven-point proposal", "middle road" and "high degree of autonomy" and so on, could hear people Yunshanwuzhao . However carefully Daliang, concealment, and Key words there is only one - "Tibet independence."
More than half a century, whether it is set up government-in-exile or organizations armed rebellion, whether it is defamatory rumors, or planning violence, the Dalai clique have never given up the attempt to split the motherland. "Tibet independence" remains unchanged nature of the "context", the concepts of innovation, is the Dalai clique's strategy in light of changing it.
Look up the Dalai clique "Tibet independence history" and attempting "Tibet independence" the context clearly visible.
1959 defection soon, the Dalai clique in India Moussotsi, claiming that "Tibet has always had in fact is an independent." Thereafter, until 1977, they always adhere to this position, stressing that "Tibet in history and culture are an independent country."
In the 1970s to the mid-1980s, with the domestic changes in the international situation, the Dalai Lama and his followers had to adjust strategy to reduce the tone of the initiative said, "are willing to give up Tibet independence" and the so-called "middle road", "Tibetan" And "high degree of autonomy."
But as long as a little research can be found, the Dalai clique declared that the "middle road", its meaning and essence of "Tibet independence." Take the Dalai clique of the central government can not require troops in Tibet, Tibet with other countries or international organizations to maintain diplomatic relations - as we all know, if a country's central government can not be troops on its territory, under their jurisdiction to allow a Local Government and foreign governments or international organizations to maintain diplomatic relations, will no sovereignty at all. Even the Dalai clique "Tibet Journal" editorial Dhondup Tsering admitted that it "tantamount to the independence of Tibet."
Clearly, the so-called "middle way" is, in essence, Tibet belongs to China to change the legal status, denying the Chinese Government has sovereignty over Tibet. Advocating independence from the public to disguise an independent, step-by-step in place to achieve independence, the Dalai clique's ultimate goal still is to separate Tibet from China.
Since ancient times Tibet is an inalienable part of China, which is including the Tibetan compatriots, a fact recognized by people throughout the country. No matter how the Dalai clique played up the so-called "Tibet issue", the world has never been a country openly admitted that the so-called "Tibet independence." Attempt to "Tibet independence" will not do, in disguise "Tibet independence" does not trip. This is because the "Tibet issue" is the crucial point of national sovereignty. To safeguard national unity and territorial integrity and sovereignty of each country is a sacred right, but also basic principles of international law.
The issue of sovereignty can not be discussed, to split China is doomed to failure. At that time, the poor and weak old China, the imperialists can not splitting Tibet from China today, in an increasingly strong and prosperous socialist China, "Tibet independence" attempt more can not be realized. National unification and ethnic unity is the Chinese people's core interests, it is the enduring mysteries of the Chinese civilization of the Chinese nation is above all the social and psychological, moral values and national spirit. Chinese people have never regarded safeguarding national unity and territorial integrity as a bounden duty and the primacy of the mission. In the face of "Tibet independence", the Chinese government and people as well as overseas Chinese and the unprecedented solidarity shown, are in this for thousands of years to form a consensus - to achieve national reunification is a national hero; caused by ethnic separatism, Is a historical sinner
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment